If the “Broker” Lives on Telegram and a Cloned Website, It’s Not Investing, It’s a Funnel...from lester

12 Jan 2026, 12:32 · Views 365

This Bangladesh case is a classic retail-trap playbook dressed up with modern tools: a cloned website to borrow legitimacy, Telegram groups to mass-recruit, and a web of bank and crypto accounts to move money fast and disappear cleanly. Real investing does not require you to trust anonymous “representatives” who contact you directly, promise fast returns, and push you into private channels where there’s no regulated record, no dispute process, and no accountability. The multiple accounts, third-party Binance identities, and stored QR codes are exactly what you’d expect from an operation built for scale and evasion: rotate identities, fragment the cashflow, and keep victims talking while withdrawals stall. The market has plenty of ways to grow wealth, but none of them need secrecy or urgency. My rule is simple: if the platform can’t be verified through official regulatory registers, and the relationship is managed through Telegram DMs, assume it’s fraud until proven otherwise.

Disclaimer: The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent the official position of Followme. Followme does not take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information provided and is not liable for any actions taken based on the content, unless explicitly stated in writing.

Like this article? Show your appreciation by sending a tip to the author.

As a retired professional trader, the ongoing fraud cases involving fake SEBI-registered platforms in India are a reminder of the darker side of investment markets. Scammers prey on the same human vulnerabilities that make some of the best opportunities in real markets — greed, impatience, and the desire for easy profits. The key red flag here is that genuine trading platforms never ask for large payments upfront or require additional fees to release funds, especially through informal channels like WhatsApp. In real investing, especially on a regulated platform, you’re dealing with official communication, transparent reporting, and verifiable account balances. Scammers create fabricated stories, show fake growth, and demand additional payments, all designed to exploit emotions and force victims into hasty decisions. Any investment that asks for secrecy, pressure, or “fees to release funds” is a direct signal to back away. Legitimate investment opportunities do not need to hide behind virtual profits or promises of high returns. This type of fraud is particularly concerning because it’s becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. New investors often don’t know where to turn for validation and can be manipulated by the pressure of “guaranteed” returns. The fact that these scammers are using widely recognized names, like "Standard Chartered GP" and fake SEBI registration, is a direct attempt to mislead and build a false sense of security. It’s crucial for anyone entering the markets to understand the power of verification and due diligence. As someone who has seen the rise and fall of many market players, I urge investors to avoid trading on any platform that doesn’t offer full transparency and regulation. In such cases, the best strategy is to verify, question everything, and walk away from any platform that uses secrecy or unsolicited contact to lure you in.

lester

As someone who has spent years in the markets, the Kayple case in Vietnam feels painfully familiar, and I honestly wish more people, including myself earlier on, had learned this lesson sooner. Every cycle, scams reinvent themselves with new buzzwords: blockchain ecosystems, AI trading, play-to-earn, cross-chain — but the structure underneath never changes. Guaranteed or “automatic” high returns are not innovation, they’re bait. What stands out in this case is how easily fake dashboards, fabricated token economics, and social proof from Telegram and Zalo groups were enough to convince thousands of investors. I’ve seen this pattern too many times: limited token supply, overseas registration claims, paid “leaders” to expand reach, early paper profits, then a sudden “system maintenance” excuse when the money runs out. Real trading doesn’t need secrecy, leaders recruiting investors, or excuses for withdrawals. I wish the industry had done a better job years ago teaching people that complexity and jargon do not equal legitimacy.

lester