An effort by US regulators to incentivise the switch to SA-CCR may be having the opposite effect.
Photo: fxmarkets
US banking regulators have been asked to clarify whether certain client cleared trades can be included in netting sets under the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR). The answer could shift the calculus of banks that are currently weighing whether to adopt the regime early. The confusion centres on last-minute changes to the US version of SA-CCR. The final rule adopted in January allows cleared transactions that are settled-to-market (STM) to be included in the same
Reprinted from fxmarkets, the copyright all reserved by the original author.
风险提示：以上内容仅代表作者或嘉宾的观点，不代表 FOLLOWME 的任何观点及立场，且不代表 FOLLOWME 同意其说法或描述，也不构成任何投资建议。对于访问者根据 FOLLOWME 社区提供的信息所做出的一切行为，除非另有明确的书面承诺文件，否则本社区不承担任何形式的责任。
FOLLOWME 交易社区网址: www.followme.com
加载失败()